Skip to main content

Error message

  • The specified file temporary://file2BlE3x could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://file2aJryy could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://file9KQu3w could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://filePF9oUy could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://fileHLkkgx could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://fileaGmn5u could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://fileD53BMv could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.

Union wins recognition battle with pork company

BRITAIN’S largest pork processing firm must thrash out a union recognition agreement in the next few weeks, following a ruling from state arbitrators.

The Bakers, Food and Allied Workers Union told the Central Arbitration Committee that bosses at meat giant Tulip had been spreading “scare stories” about the consequences of union recognition among the largely east European workforce.

In evidence submitted to the committee, management said it “did not consider that a majority of the workers in the bargaining unit were likely to support recognition” and that workers “did not understand the implications of collective bargaining,” according to a report on the decision to accept the BFAWU application.

The union had sought recognition of a collective bargaining unit for workers involved in tasks including curing, cutting, dispatch and hygiene at the company’s site in Coalville, Leicestershire.

The committee said there was no need for a ballot to be held before enforcing recognition, as it had seen sufficient evidence that most workers were members of the union.

Corroboration of staff lists and union membership lists supplied confidentially to the committee showed that 105 of the 185 workers in the relevant grades were union members, amounting to 56.8 per cent of the workforce.

A previous attempt by Unite to seek recognition in 2009 was unsuccessful.

BFAWU regional officer George Atwall told the Star: “People wanted a union, but they were pressured by the company.

“This has been one of our most successful campaigns. We’re a small union, we haven’t got the facilities like a big union, but we’ll still be putting out the campaign until the company sits down and draws up the recognition agreements.”

OWNED BY OUR READERS

We're a reader-owned co-operative, which means you can become part of the paper too by buying shares in the People’s Press Printing Society.

 

 

Become a supporter

Fighting fund

You've Raised:£ 9,899
We need:£ 8,101
12 Days remaining
Donate today