Skip to main content

Error message

  • The specified file temporary://fileCRv6jU could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://filee2tjeU could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://fileIBX7mQ could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://filelb66aT could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://fileUkCOyT could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://file4uvnRT could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://fileAzMcrS could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.

Prince Harry was ‘singled out’ when stripped of his public security, Court of Appeal told

PRINCE HARRY was “singled out for different, unjustified and inferior treatment” when the government downgraded his taxpayer-funded level of security, the Court of Appeal heard today.

The Home Office’s executive committee for the protection of royalty and public figures took the decision in February 2020 after the Duke of Sussex quit as a “working” royal.

Challenging a High Court dismissal of his appeal over the decision, the prince’s barrister Shaheed Fatima KC said that the committee “did not apply its own terms of reference to that decision-making process.”

It failed to get an assessment from an “expert specialist body called the risk management board,” instead coming up with a “different and so-called ‘bespoke process’,” she said, as the prince sat behind her taking notes in court.

Sir James Eadie KC, for the Home Office, said that then-committee chair, Sir Richard Mottram, said an assessment would be “difficult to produce in an effective manner.”

The hearing is due to conclude tommorrow.

OWNED BY OUR READERS

We're a reader-owned co-operative, which means you can become part of the paper too by buying shares in the People’s Press Printing Society.

 

 

Become a supporter

Fighting fund

You've Raised:£ 9,899
We need:£ 8,101
12 Days remaining
Donate today