Skip to main content

Error message

  • The specified file temporary://filez7Uzzc could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://file45CmLc could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://fileLug5yc could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://file2yLiVa could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://filejAimE8 could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://fileZNa2ka could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.
  • The specified file temporary://file2jWqR8 could not be copied, because the destination directory is not properly configured. This may be caused by a problem with file or directory permissions. More information is available in the system log.

Lords: Con-Dem plan for universities to carry out terrorism checks is threat to free speech

PEERS hit out again yesterday at the government’s latest attempts to enforce a legal counter-terrorism duty on universities under its controversial Prevent strategy.

The government was previously forced to make amendments to the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill to allay fears that it would undermine free speech.

Under the Bill, the Prevent strategy for dealing with extremism would impose new duties on bodies such as local authorities and universities.

But peers argued that the legislation would prevent ­people who showed signs of “non-violent extremism” from speaking on campus, undermining their freedom of speech.

Labour peer and leading Queen’s Counsel Baroness Kennedy said she “greatly” regretted that the Labour front bench did not support removing the plans from the Bill.

“The complaints and anxieties of the academic world and the many academics who have expressed concern are not trivial,” she said.

“They are being expressed for a reason and it is one of the reasons why our institutions of higher education are respected.”

OWNED BY OUR READERS

We're a reader-owned co-operative, which means you can become part of the paper too by buying shares in the People’s Press Printing Society.

 

 

Become a supporter

Fighting fund

You've Raised:£ 9,899
We need:£ 8,101
12 Days remaining
Donate today