Skip to main content

From Pentonville to P&O: the wrong arm of the law

KEVIN HUSSEY and ADRIAN WEIR recount how an overambitious set of anti-union measures from the Tories was defeated by mass working-class resistance just short of a general strike — and how the legal situation has changed since the 1970s

TODAY marks the 50th anniversary of the culmination of the battle against the anti-union Industrial Relations Act introduced by the Conservative government of Ted Heath.  

Five shop stewards on the London docks were arrested and jailed for contempt of the National Industrial Relations Court (NIRC) in July 1972 but were released within days as the TUC mobilised for a general strike in support of the “Pentonville Five,” as they became known.  

By such a sad coincidence, Bernie Steer the last surviving member of the five, died on July 20 this year.  

Trade unionists, perhaps for the last time in living memory, confronted the forces of the state and won. The anti-union laws were consigned to the dustbin of history.  

The Industrial Relations Act did not just appear from thin air. The political and ideological groundwork for legislating against industrial action, particularly that led by shop stewards, had been laid in the previous decade.  

For most of the 1960s, governments of whatever political stripe had been struggling to deal with a resurgent shop stewards movement and what they believed was the unions’ damaging contribution to the so-called wage-price inflationary spiral, the balance of payments crisis or whatever other economic ills of post-colonial Britain.  

The newly elected Harold Wilson Labour government in 1964 established a royal commission to examine the working of unions (and employers’ associations) and the system of industrial relations in Britain — the Donovan commission.  

Although Donovan was said to be considering a recommendation of legal status for industrial relations and collective bargaining and thereby legal sanctions for breach of collective agreements, the senior academic working with the commission, Hugh Clegg, successfully lobbied for a recommendation that industrial relations should be reformed by voluntary means.  

In 1968 voluntary reform was not what was required by the Labour government. Its subsequent white paper on industrial relations reform, In Place of Strife, proposed legal restraints on the right to strike.  

There was to be an industrial board to police the new framework with financial penalties for workers who stayed away from work with, it was presumed, jail for those who refused to pay the fine; what became known as the “penal sanctions.”  

Recognising which way the prevailing wind was blowing, the Communist Party in 1966 launched the Liaison Committee for the Defence of Trade Unions (LCDTU) as a means of mobilising shop stewards and union activists to campaign against this trend towards restrictions on shop stewards’ freedom of operation and the right to strike.  

In the face of TUC co-ordinated opposition, Wilson rowed back from In Place of Strife but the damage was done. The Conservatives won the general election in 1970 and set about constructing their own reform of industrial relations with the 1971 Industrial Relations Act.  

In February and June 1972, the LCDTU organised two conferences, attended by about 1,200 shop stewards and activists, to mobilise opposition to the Industrial Relations Act and the NIRC, the special division of the High Court set up under the terms of the Act. The June conference pledged action should any shop steward or activist be jailed for breach of the Industrial Relations Act.

Work on the docks was finally decasualised in 1967 — however, by 1970 with dock and lighterage companies going out of business, hundreds of dock workers were returned to the National Dock Labour Board “temporary unattached register” — casual working again.  

In the early 1970s trade unionists were confronted with the legal challenge of the Industrial Relations Act and at the same time the challenge of technological change that would only accelerate in the last decades of the 20th century.  

For dockers the technological development was containerisation. The shop stewards embarked on a campaign that argued the stuffing and stripping of containers was dock work that should be carried out by registered dock workers even if not carried out in the docks.  

The road to Pentonville started in March 1972 when haulage company Heatons was granted an injunction by the NIRC against the T&G to prevent boycott action in a dispute where the company would not agree to employ registered dock workers to carry out stuffing and stripping.  

In April Heatons commenced proceeding for contempt but as the T&G had a policy of non-co-operation with the Industrial Relations Act it did not attend the court; it was fined £5,000 in its absence. Dockers in Liverpool voted to continue their boycott action against hauliers not prepared to meet their terms. Heatons and another haulier, Craddocks, applied for contempt proceedings after a further injunction had been ignored; this time the T&G was fined £50,000 in its absence.  

The key issue was that the court wanted the union to be held responsible for the actions of lay representatives, not employees of the union. The T&G would not accept this and anyway, it argued in court, the shop stewards’ campaign would continue even if it did try to regulate the activities of lay representatives.  

In April London dockers commenced boycott action against Hayes Wharf, owners of a cold storage depot in Dagenham which did not employ registered dockers. By May the dockers were boycotting work from Dagenham Storage and UK Cold Storage, both Hayes Wharf companies. By June the boycott action included the Chobham Farm depot in Stratford.  

The NIRC of course held that stuffing and stripping was not dock work and issued an injunction for the boycott to cease which was ignored. On June 16 a court officer, the Tipstaff, was sent to arrest three shop stewards, Bernie Steer, Vic Turner and Alan Williams for contempt.  

Across the country 35,000 dock workers went on strike in response. The little-known official solicitor then ruled that there had been insufficient evidence to convict and the warrants were stayed.  

In early July the NIRC was advised that another firm in east London, Midland Cold Storage, was subject to boycott action. On July 6 the court heard evidence from private detectives hired by the company about the shop stewards’ movements and activities; on July 8 the court issued interim orders against named shop stewards.

On Friday July 21 the NIRC issued arrest warrants for Steer and Turner plus Conny Clancy, Tony Merrick and Derek Watkins; when arrested, they were taken to Pentonville prison.  

On the day of the warrants being issued there was a London shop stewards meeting but when the news came through no names were relayed to the meeting. Clancy and Merrick were arrested outside Midland Cold Storage; Watkins and Steer were arrested at home.  

The next day Saturday July 22, at a rally on Tower Hill involving printers, miners and dockers, it was agreed to march on Pentonville.  

The combined forces of dockers, miners and printers then marched to Fleet Street to successfully call out the print workers and ensure no Sunday titles were published with their biased stories about the Pentonville Five.  

The news bulletins were carrying stories that Turner was in hiding. If he was, he was hiding in plain sight as he was seen in a number of East End pubs on Saturday evening.  

On Sunday July 23, Kevin Hussey (co-author of this piece) and his cousin Colin Coughlin, both dockers and union activists, bumped into Turner on Barking Road; the three decided to go to Pentonville.  

On arrival outside the prison Turner was given a hero’s welcome as he put on a picket’s armband. Of course, all the cheering alerted the police to his presence; a senior police officer asked Turner if he was indeed Turner and if yes, would he accompany him. Turner replied “No thanks.” The officer returned half an hour later with the official solicitor who confirmed Turner’s identity and he was duly arrested.  

On Monday July 24 Aslef train drivers at Waterloo struck in support of the jailed dockers. The T&G in Scotland called out its members; all across Britain industrial workers struck — rail, buses, airports, mines, engineering and shipping. Much of this solidarity work was organised by activists associated with the LCDTU.  

At the TUC general council, the AUEW engineering union led by Hugh Scanlon, supported by the T&G’s Jack Jones, successfully moved a motion calling for a general strike to ensure the release of the jailed dockers, the first time since 1926 such action would have been taken. The date set was Monday July 31.  

Faced with mass solidarity action and TUC mobilisation the government again instructed the official solicitor to intervene — to find a means to get the five men out. His argument was that the evidence given by private detectives couldn’t be relied upon to convict; the dockers were freed, carried shoulder high from the prison and welcomed by a mass rally on Wednesday July 26.  

The Industrial Relations Act became a dead a letter: no other employer ever resorted to using its provisions.  

Also in 1972 the miners struck for higher wages, were awarded a “special case” pay rise — and struck again in 1974. This strike that provoked Heath to famously ask the nation to vote on “who runs the country the government or the unions?” The electorate replied “clearly not you” and voted in a Labour government in two general elections in 1974, a government that quickly repealed the Industrial Relations Act. 

In 1971 workers at Upper Clyde Shipbuilders under threat of closure occupied the yards and started a work-in. This sparked a wave of occupations and work-ins. In 1972 workers at Briant Colour printers in south London went into occupation and began producing propaganda material for the striking dockers, particularly the iconic poster calling for the release of the Pentonville Five.  

It did not all go the way of the workers though. In 1972 a national building workers’ strike was defeated which had two devastating consequences. The building employers decided never again to have a large directly employed workforce and embarked upon a process of casualising the industry with most building workers in the private sector having to opt for bogus self-employment.  

Secondly, a group of workers picketing a building site in Shrewsbury were fitted up by the police and convicted of serious public order offences and some went to prison. It took until March 2021 for all 24 pickets’ convictions to be quashed.

But the Conservatives did not waste their time in opposition. From 1974-79 they worked on the most detailed plans to privatise state assets and smash the unions. In the case of coal both of these objectives were dealt with in one blow in 1984-85, particularly with the militarisation of the police. In 1989 they abolished the National Dock Labour Scheme which heralded the return of casual working in the docks.  

From 1980 they also enacted a whole series of laws that were designed to stop unions organising effective industrial action. These laws achieved the Conservatives’ long-term objective of making unions liable for the actions of their lay representatives unless a union repudiated its reps’ actions.  

The target in all of this was the opening up of union funds to damages claims. They had learnt their lesson from the Heath years: no shop steward was to go to prison — there would be no more martyrs. Subsequent laws interfered with unions’ internal elections and with their political arrangements: a total package designed to demobilise and demotivate workers’ resistance to neoliberalism.  

We should rightly celebrate the Pentonville Five and all that was achieved in 1972. What we’ve not got to grips with is the series of laws passed since 1980.  

Look at what happened at P&O earlier this year — an employer blatantly breaks the law on collective consultation and fires and replaces the crews. Other workers in the ports and elsewhere are legally barred, or at least their unions are, from positively responding to any calls for solidarity action to stop the employer dead in its tracks.  

The current strike wave in connection with the cost-of-living crisis may now bring the operation of these laws into sharp relief and many will be looking to the Labour Party to go beyond its current welcome proposals in A New Deal for Working People and commit to give effect to a repeal of Thatcher’s laws 40 years after they were enacted.  

This article appeared in Labour Outlook.  

Kevin Hussey is a former London docker, a shop steward and a veteran of the Pentonville Five campaign.

Adrian Weir is assistant secretary of the Campaign for Trade Union Freedom and is standing for re-election to Labour’s National Policy Forum — follow him on Twitter @AMJWeir. 

OWNED BY OUR READERS

We're a reader-owned co-operative, which means you can become part of the paper too by buying shares in the People’s Press Printing Society.

 

 

Become a supporter

Fighting fund

You've Raised:£ 9,899
We need:£ 8,101
12 Days remaining
Donate today