Skip to main content

Fifa to punish racism in Russia at World Cup

Disciplinary chairman aims to tackle problem

Fifa disciplinary chairman Claudio Sulser said yesterday that Russia will be punished if their supporters show any form of racist behaviour at the 2018 World Cup in the country.

Sulser’s comments come just a fortnight after CSKA Moscow were forced to play their home match against Manchester City in the Champions League behind closed doors following past violent and racist behaviour from their supporters, although 350 Russian supporters were able to gain entry to the ground on the evening.

“It’s a situation we have to deal with,” Sulser said about the dangers of racism manifesting itself at the 2018 World Cup.

“It’s very critical and not easy to decide over but we have to see what is the responsibility of the association.

“We cannot sanction the association if they are doing something which is fair or ethical from their point of view, but you cannot forget about the situation.

“You have the society, then you have the people who come into a stadium and people do not change because they are in a stadium.

“It’s a problem of the society and it’s correct to sanction an association for these attitudes.”

Fifa’s anti-discriminatory chief Jeffrey Webb said at the 2014 World Cup in Brazil there was a lack of staff deployed to tackle racist and homophobic issues and there was a “disconnect” between the governing body’s stated aim of stamping out discrimination at games and its failure to use trained staff to investigate and report on cases.

No action was taken against German fans who blacked up their faces at the match against Ghana or Croatian fans who displayed neonazi flags and insignia.

Fifa’s disciplinary committee did investigate the case where Mexican fans chanted the word “puto” — taken to be a homophobic term in Spanish — at opposition goalkeepers during games but ruled there would be no punishment for the Mexican Football Association.

“If you want to sanction for this word you have to change the provision,” Sulser said.

“You have to change it to not only discriminatory but appropriate in this case.

“The Commission analysed it and said it was not discriminatory. Some say the word is discriminatory, some not.

“This is the problem because it is not like mathematics wh

OWNED BY OUR READERS

We're a reader-owned co-operative, which means you can become part of the paper too by buying shares in the People’s Press Printing Society.

 

 

Become a supporter

Fighting fund

You've Raised:£ 9,899
We need:£ 8,101
12 Days remaining
Donate today